Need
to Know Vs. Want to Know
- Economics
and the Business of Publishing
- By Stephen J. Kerr
Do you ever stop and ask yourself, "Does the world really need this book?"
So many publishers get caught up in the whirlwind of manuscripts, editing
and press dates that they may loose the rationale behind what they do.
A publisher is an information gatekeeper who must be discriminating about
who he or she sends through the toll gate. The most successful publishers
are those who disseminate information that the world needs. A really
good novel or fine poetry does fit into that category because we are
all bettered by its presence. But, by in large, the most profitable and
enduring publishers disseminate information that people need to have
for their education, careers, avocations and spiritual sustenance.
You may have noticed that there is a direct economic
correlation between what we call "Need to Know" information versus "Want
to Know" information. Information that could be considered Need to Know
are textbooks, scientific, medical & industrial research, government
economic studies and professional information. These are books that you
must have to get through school, do your job or compete in the marketplace.
They are not optional - they are mandatory. One of our clients publishes
books that help fund managers chart stock performance and hence make
better buying decisions. Millions of dollars are riding on their decisions
daily. You've never heard of them and they've never sold a single book
in a bookstore, but their books sell for $250 to $500 per copy and brokers
around the world buy up every issue. To their audience, these books are
absolutely Need to Know. On the other extreme is the umpteenth book on
low-fat cooking by Suzy Homemaker in Spokane, Washington. This is a Want
to Know book that people probably could live without. There are literally
hundreds of low-fat cookbooks on the market and Ms. Homemaker will have
to be very lucky to find an audience. Need To Know books always sell
for much higher prices and more consistently than Want To Know books.
The marketplace votes with its dollars…and it will judge whether this
book or that book fulfills a "need" in the marketplace. Want to Know
books are read mostly for their entertainment value.
Most Want to Know books contain information that
was not difficult, expensive or dangerous to obtain. These books mostly
spring forth from the fertile minds of their authors and contain information
that is more opinion than fact. Want to Know books go out looking for
a market. Need To Know books have a ready market that is anxiously awaiting
their arrival. A good Need to Know book might be an exposé on
a high profile government corruption case, cracked by the FBI and written
by the agent who was in charge of the investigation. The public needs
and wants to know what goes on in their society and need to hear about
it from a credible source.
Make no mistake, E-Books, Books-on-Tape and even
the Internet works on the same principle. The only two e-magazine Web
sites that are consistently profitable for their founders are Consumer
Reports and The Wall Street Journal. These sites are subscription based
and provide their readers with vital information that they can use in
their work and daily lives. Our firm has been helping publishers market
their content to Internet Web portals in a new business we call RightsPower.
The content that has the largest paying market is scientific, technical,
financial, medical and economic research. This is the kind of information
that the Web cannot get enough of. By and large, it is not the consumers
that buy digital content off of the Web, it's the business professionals
and scientists. Their jobs and their companies depend on the timely,
critical information that publishers provide. For the most part, e-books
and Web sites with general information, common knowledge or low value
content have been a commercial failure.
As business brokers we know that Need To Know
publishers sell faster and for much higher values than Want To Know publishers.
Professional and educational publishers are consistently more profitable
and business-wise, more stable than their trade counterparts. Trade publishers
that occupy a specific niche or use direct or target marketing are consistently
more profitable and stable than general trade publishers selling books
to Barnes & Noble and Waldenbooks.
No publisher wants to think that their
books have little economic chance for success.
However, if your publishing company is producing
books with a very low Need To Know quotient, there is little chance that
you are going to be a long term survivor of the publishing wars.
The secret to success for small press publishers,
who have limited means to create a market for their authors' works is
to concentrate on titles with the highest possible public need. Publishers
are often faced with a dilemma when they are presented with a really
well written manuscript about a subject that may, or may not have any
real market appeal. On one hand you have two or three years of the author's
life sitting on your desk -- a good if not Pulitzer Prize winning work
-- and on the other hand, you have to stay in business. If this book
fits squarely into the mission of your publishing program, you have the
funds to promote it properly and support it while it finds its audience
-- by all means take the plunge. If it does not meet these criteria,
then you must pass.
I am convinced that many people are attracted
to the publishing business for the same reason that people are attracted
to the movie business. There is a little bit of immortality in creating
works of literary or cinematic art that will live on long after we are
gone. It is a creative and exciting business that promises great personal,
if not financial rewards. I think that we can all agree that there have
been a whole lot of movies made that cannot possibly justify the celluloid
that they used up. Few publishers are willing to admit that many of their
books are looked on the same way. Some definitely do not justify the
paper and ink used to make them. With 50,000 to 60,000 new titles being
marketed every year, they can't all be Hunt For The Red October or To
Kill A Mockingbird.
Before you call to remind me that To Kill A Mockingbird
by Harper Lee took many years to become a commercial success and recognized
as a classic American novel, I want to clarify that works of great fiction
are DEFINITELY Need to Know publishing, in my book. It is hard to evaluate
fiction along a strict Want To Know -- Need To Know continuum. People
buy and read fiction mostly for its personal entertainment value. Many
of us value highly our time, sitting with a good book by the fire. Others
like to listen to an enlightening or entertaining book-on-tape while
driving long distances for work or pleasure. Great fiction makes us all
better people. Like going to plays, fiction is a mirror that we all need
to look into now and again.
Publishers can get trapped, publishing low value
Want To Know books for years and years as they watch their family fortunes
drain away. Never knowing why their publishing company is not making
money and not growing. Publishers, like impresarios need to remember
that business is the first word in "show business". Publishing is another
form of show business. Yes, it is education and enlightenment as well.
But, first we entertain and then we educate and enlighten.
Audio publishers, video publishers, game publishers,
CD-ROM, Internet and software publishers must all keep their eye on the
bottom line if they wish to remain publishers for long. If you have a
choice, publishing highly targeted Need To Know information is the surest
way to keep in the game.
|